My Facebook contribution has gotten political. I know my own tone has switched from just fun, light hearted stuff and business related things to much more opposition to political change. In that time, I’ve noted at least two occasions where someone has posted a “Get over it” note (and then deleted it — yes, I saw it), and now, I’ve had another leave that comment online.
To paraphrase: “Dave, get over it. Trump won. You just need to move on.”
What specifically does “get over it” mean? What level of problem should I ignore? Should I ignore hate crimes? Should I ignore policy decisions? Should I ignore fiscal policy? Should I ignore deportations, if or when they start happening? Should I wait for things I consider immoral to happen, even while they are being discussed openly? What does “get over it” mean — specifically? Should I acquiesce to decisions I don’t think are moral, simply because the President says them?
What is “moving on”? Allowing the government to do what they want? To be unopposed?
Would you prefer to just ignore the facts of what is happening?
One of the recognized problems with recent information online is that “fake news” has taken too much of our conversation and mindshare. I’ve always considered that I am very careful about the news and information that I curate. I select sources that I consider strong, accurate media sources, typically the New York Times or the Washington Post (which I subscribe to). If you do not like my curations, that is your choice — but the goal is to stay informed and not allow actions that I do not consider “normal” to go by unchecked.
Prior to this election, I believed that my vote was enough to influence the discussion, and that ultimately, that what I viewed as sensible, educated minds would prevail.
This is my space to voice my opinion. If you don’t like it — that’s absolutely your right, and you aren’t compelled to agree with me. My ask has always been that you consider the opinion, as I will consider yours. Do you believe I curate and try and deliver value? Is it possible there is something to consider in the information you are seeing? Do you believe I have some level of intelligence and have questioned the source before sharing the information? However, “just get over it” is dangerous in a free society, and no, I won’t do that.
I won’t stand by as we consider taking away rights from fellow Americans.
I won’t stand by as hate crimes rise.
I won’t stand by as some attack journalism.
I won’t stand by as we make the world LESS safe by lack of consideration that words matter.
I won’t stand by and let false information dominate and influence the world. Facts matter.
I’m taking action too — this isn’t just a series of Facebook rants. So far, I’ve joined the ACLU and the Southern Poverty Law Center, with monthly contributions (not just one time contributions). I’m looking at ProPublica now, which focuses on non-profit journalism. I’m in conversations with similarly minded Generation X’ers about specific actions we can take — more to come on that. I'm not content to just sit by and let the world happen to me.
So for me, no, I won’t “Get over it.” I’m getting to work on fighting back — actually taking actions that result in outcome. I won’t be passive and allow a minority opinion — both less than a majority of Americans overall voted for Trump AND less than a majority of the vote of those who voted — change society in a way that I feel is destructive. Don't think that the electoral college result is in any way a mandate -- it's not.
Martin Niemöller famously wrote:
In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;
And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;
And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;
And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up.
It may seem cliche to compare to Nazism — you may think this is overblown. You may think I’m wrong — and here is hoping I am wrong. Being wrong would be a wonderful outcome — being wrong means that the fight isn’t necessary, and that a President Trump will result in a stronger, safer world. May you be right.
However, the evidence I see doesn’t line up with that — from a lack of any consideration of what diplomacy means to assembling a team of “rich people” with no evidence of understanding of the subject matter to advise him to what looks like intense conflicts of interest from a moral (if not legal) perspective, President Trump does NOT look like a leader who the insight and leadership to guide us. And if I don't speak up, because it's "not me"... then shame on me.
Thus, “getting over it” means allowing things to happen that I believe will damage us as a society. “Getting over it” means looking the other way at what I perceive as corruption and immoral choices for our society.
Is that really what you want? Do you really want people that allow things to happen to them? Leadership is about taking action — speaking out and doing something. I’m doing something. I’m not only talking about it, I’m taking actions.
He's President. That's not being argued. But to imply that one has to go along with everything he does -- that's missing the point entirely. (And, if you are strongly Republican, that is hypocrisy to the extreme. I direct you to Mitch McConnell whose policy was to block everything without consideration. It was fine in 2008 but we should "get over it" now? That argument has no legs.)
If you don’t like what you see, you can make your own decisions. I will respect you for that, and will continue to engage with people I don’t agree with. I will happily have a drink with you or break bread or share a laugh — that’s what good people do. I will strive to be a good person and continue to be a well rounded person in life, engaging in multiple interests, not limited to one single topic.
If you don’t believe I deliver value or insight, you are welcome to select “Hide this kind of post” if you want to start trying to curate your feed. You’re also welcome to “unfollow” me entirely if you think I don’t deliver any value. My LinkedIn feed will be only business related, and my Twitter feed will include more shared articles, but none of them will be political. If you want my opinions on things personal, both political and lifestyle, they will be on Facebook. There will be all kinds of things on my Facebook feed, as it's mine to share the things I think are important.
If you don’t agree with me, fine. You don’t have to. Post your own materials. Or Hide my posts. Or pick another feed.
But if “get over it” is that you’re not comfortable with another opinion or are reading them and feeling uncomfortable with what you’re reading … well, that’s on you, not on me.
The uncensored view of the IT Channel, industry, and life around it. Everything posted here is entirely my own opinion. Nothing on this blog is intended as any official statement from any organization, and the views expressed here are entirely my own. This is my personal blog, with musings and ideas that are mine.
Saturday, December 3, 2016
Sunday, May 29, 2016
WiFi signal problem that's well beyond the norm.
I’m completely stuck on a wireless problem.
What at first glance appears like slow wifi is actually much more insidious — while at times I can get full bandwidth, it will then drop dramatically, going from a solid set of speeds between 60-90 Mbps download to levels that are measured instead in Kbps, from 20 to 50 Kpbs. At first, I noticed this only on my Macbook. However, intensive testing revealed that I could see the same problem on other machines -- my Windows laptop and my iPhone.
My wireless network is provided by a set of three Apple Airport units of various ages. Coverage is fantastic, and the units generally load balance across the three level house. I can replicate this problem regardless of which AirPort / Access Point the endpoint is connected to. From Airport Utility:
I have two primary production wireless networks, evolvetech_extreme and evolvetech_extreme 5Ghz. Using iStumbler to show the list of networks:
Note there is a set of "_uk" networks that are not at all linked to the same network, living outside the firewall. I can replicate the problem on BOTH the 2.4 Ghz and the 5Ghz networks. This seems to tell me that I don't have significant channel overlap nor signal problems. I've also done some testing with Android's WiFi Analyzer and I can't find a problem.
These speed tests were taken within 5 minutes of each other:
From a Macbook:
From an iPhone:
From a Windows laptop:
In this example, I'm seeing the problem on the Windows machine but not the other two.
During this, network probes on the firewall show me that the overall bandwidth (which is 75/75 Mbps), is running without significant load:
So far, I can tell that:
- The endpoint doesn't seem to matter. This happens "sometimes" on the iPhone, or on the Macbook, or on the Windows machine. Sometimes all at the same time, other times just one one.
- I've tested the lists of which access point the endpoint is connected to, and as far as I can tell it doesn't matter.
- The wired network is fine.
- Rebooting all the access points seems to clear the problem for a while.
I'm totally at a loss. Looking for some help!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
New Retro & Modern Gaming Setup
I redesigned my office, and it deserved a new post to discuss the layout and the setup. The old design worked great, but didn't look ...
-
In March of 2018, I visited the doctor for my checkup. Feeling fine, I expected things to go very well. Instead, the conversation went...
-
I redesigned my office, and it deserved a new post to discuss the layout and the setup. The old design worked great, but didn't look ...
-
[Revised April 5, 2019 for new systems] I've been working on my gaming setup for a while, and finally have it at a place I'm reall...